Stormin08
Well-known member
the issue with swapping the SHOCK portion of the set up, is valving...do some homework here, the shocks are going to be valved to the COIL rate.
you are going to go down a path of frustration trying to stay overly simple...keeping the spacer lift doesnt usually mix well with going performance shock. you have a decent control arm which helps clear the coils at droop....cycle the suspension, see if you are hitting droop stops yet (tab on side of coil bucket under control arm), while looking at the arms placement near the COIL itself. some spacers lower the assembly enough, that the arm starts to contact the coil itself and limits droop.
a shock like the eibach uses a 3" dia. coil, unlike mine that use a 3.5" coil. you gain way more than a static lift height with a good shock, and especially if adding a shock with a reservoir. moving the piston into the resi, gives a considerable amount of travel to the shock.
you are going to go down a path of frustration trying to stay overly simple...keeping the spacer lift doesnt usually mix well with going performance shock. you have a decent control arm which helps clear the coils at droop....cycle the suspension, see if you are hitting droop stops yet (tab on side of coil bucket under control arm), while looking at the arms placement near the COIL itself. some spacers lower the assembly enough, that the arm starts to contact the coil itself and limits droop.
a shock like the eibach uses a 3" dia. coil, unlike mine that use a 3.5" coil. you gain way more than a static lift height with a good shock, and especially if adding a shock with a reservoir. moving the piston into the resi, gives a considerable amount of travel to the shock.